Medvedev advised to apply to the World League for Sexual Reforms, which is mentioned in the Golden Calf, regarding the application of the Russia-NATO act. An alliance official previously stated that the act would not deter the bloc's actions
Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev, after the words of the head of the NATO military committee that the act of Russia— NATO will not restrain the actions of the alliance, he remembered the clause from international law Clausula rebus sic stantibus.
“There is such a principle in international law, more precisely, the so-called“ legal clause ”, a clause in Latin. Its meaning is that the contract remains valid for the parties only as long as the circumstances that led to its conclusion remain, — Medvedev explained in Telegram.
According to him, the consequences of the bloc's statement are that “it is possible to drag nuclear weapons into the territory of new member countries (for example, Sweden and Finland), conduct provocative military exercises near our borders and do all sorts of nasty things.” Medvedev explained that earlier Russia could refer to the Founding Act when expressing dissatisfaction with the “rudeness” of alliance.
“Although the NATO members have not yet directly said about withdrawing from the Founding Act. <…> No. Clausula rebus sic stantibus worked. And if it's simpler— now address the question of the application of the Act directly to the World League for Sexual Reforms, as the unforgettable Ostap Suleiman Ibrahim Berta Maria Bender Bey advised,— concluded Medvedev.
Earlier, the chairman of the military committee of the alliance, Rob Bauer, said that the agreement with Russia continues to exist, but it “will not prevent us from doing what we have to do.” Prior to this, representatives of the countries — members of the bloc, including British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, pointed out that the act was outdated and no longer relevant.
In early February, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova noted that the Founding Act was “virtually the only one currently 'surviving' an instrument of military restraint in Europe».
Read on RBC Pro Pro Delisting Russian companies from foreign exchanges: how it affects stocks Articles Pro Strength test: how to legally refuse a job candidate became dangerous: what are the reasons Articles Pro Chinese Twitch: where advertisers' clients on streams will flow competitors. Repelling an attack on the social network Instructions
Then she explained that the document establishes a written obligation of NATO countries to carry out their collective defense not by additional permanent deployment of significant combat forces on the territory of new countries — members, that is, without going beyond the 1997 configuration. However, Zakharovane ruled out that the agreement “will suffer the fate of other agreements.”
Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube